Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 18 guests
Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
Moderators: Moderator, Site Administrators
24 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
After looking at their highlights, clark just looks more explosive where treadwell seems like he lumbers despite his good or better measurables. What does gsmb think?
- Shrico
- Freshman Gator
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:00 pm
Re: treadwell vs james clark: who looks better?
No helmet to helmet there. That was Morrison's helt to EJ's shoulder pad.

-

Homer J - Head Ball Coach
- Posts: 3613
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:59 pm
- Location: Flowery Branch, GA
Re: treadwell vs james clark: who looks better?
Clean hit, EJ probably wishes he was wearing the Hans device

-

Gatorbythebay - Heisman Gator
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:21 pm
Re: treadwell vs james clark: who looks better?
Gatorbythebay wrote:Clean hit, EJ probably wishes he was wearing the Hans device
The hit on Purifoy, on the other hand...

-

WobbleGator - Bull Gator
- Posts: 8897
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
Don't really know of the two, but ... in generic concepts explosive
rattles defenses more, changes defenses more.
Guard in tight....
play off far 
rattles defenses more, changes defenses more.
Guard in tight....
play off far 
-

rogdochar - Bull Gator
- Posts: 6735
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:17 am
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
Someone translate that for me, please.
-

law98gator - Gatorsports Legend
- Posts: 12479
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:03 pm
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
Gatorbythebay wrote:The answer to that should be somewhere on here

-

rogdochar - Bull Gator
- Posts: 6735
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:17 am
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
I'll tell u who i think looks better. The one that wants to come on down to gainesville and let the joker teach them how to be the greatest gator wideout that they can be! Whether its a 5 star or a 4, bring in the guys that want to play their guts out for the good guys.
- G8rnTtown
- Baby Gator
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:03 am
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
Shrico wrote:After looking at their highlights, clark just looks more explosive where treadwell seems like he lumbers despite his good or better measurables. What does gsmb think?
without the silly remarks.
They look like different WRs to me. Clark is shifty and makes people miss. More of a Harvin like Wr (not saying he is anywhere near Harvin but work with me here) he can make people miss and change directions well. Treadwell seems to be more of a standard WR mold. can stretch the field, and doesn't try to make people miss as much. Those types of WRs fit well on the field at the same time imo.
In the end we're all just chalk lines on the concrete Drawn only to be washed away
For the time that I've been given
I am what I am

For the time that I've been given
I am what I am

-

GatorKen - Head Ball Coach
- Posts: 4286
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:04 pm
- Location: Go Away
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
At this point, I'll take anyone that can catch the damn ball and is willing to be coached and be a program guy. I absolutely love Trey Burton and all he's been/done at UF, but his brother has bricks for hands. He is a blocking TE only. Gotta make up for that with some good-hands guys at WR.
I don't normally use signatures, but I wanted to be kewl too.
-

NavetG8r - True Gator
- Posts: 596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:59 pm
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
GatorKen wrote:Shrico wrote:After looking at their highlights, clark just looks more explosive where treadwell seems like he lumbers despite his good or better measurables. What does gsmb think?
without the silly remarks.
They look like different WRs to me. Clark is shifty and makes people miss. More of a Harvin like Wr (not saying he is anywhere near Harvin but work with me here) he can make people miss and change directions well. Treadwell seems to be more of a standard WR mold. can stretch the field, and doesn't try to make people miss as much. Those types of WRs fit well on the field at the same time imo.
Ken pretty much summed it up. Clark is very fluid, excelllent accelertion and if he's breaking a few tackles at 175# imagine what he'll do at 190. My only concern is that him and Bailey seem like clones (both perfect as return men and in the slot) and we need 6'4" that demands a safety over top (some question if Fulwood has the speed).
- ltraz
- True Gator
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:06 pm
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
Treadwell seems like a great prospect, but it's hard to imagine he is the #1 WR out there. I remember watching highlights of Dorial Green-Beckham, that guy deserved to be rated the #1 receiver in his class. I would love for Treadwell to be a Gator, but I would also be happy to see Clark join this class.

-

Gatorbythebay - Heisman Gator
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:21 pm
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
NavetG8r wrote:At this point, I'll take anyone that can catch the damn ball and is willing to be coached and be a program guy. I absolutely love Trey Burton and all he's been/done at UF, but his brother has bricks for hands. He is a blocking TE only. Gotta make up for that with some good-hands guys at WR.
makes me mad when they throw to C. Burton. kid can't catch at all.
In the end we're all just chalk lines on the concrete Drawn only to be washed away
For the time that I've been given
I am what I am

For the time that I've been given
I am what I am

-

GatorKen - Head Ball Coach
- Posts: 4286
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:04 pm
- Location: Go Away
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
Treadwell looks the part to me. He's got great hands, adequate speed, runs very good routes, strong and he's not afraid of contact. He is the best, all-around, WR I have seen this year. Clark definitely has that rare gear. It would be something if we landed both of them, along with Fullwood.
- Jrcurtis
- Senior Gator
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:39 pm
- Location: Ocala, FL
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
GatorKen wrote:NavetG8r wrote:At this point, I'll take anyone that can catch the damn ball and is willing to be coached and be a program guy. I absolutely love Trey Burton and all he's been/done at UF, but his brother has bricks for hands. He is a blocking TE only. Gotta make up for that with some good-hands guys at WR.
makes me mad when they throw to C. Burton. kid can't catch at all.
He failed miserably on the fake fg against the clowns.

-

Gatorbythebay - Heisman Gator
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:21 pm
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
Gatorbythebay wrote:GatorKen wrote:NavetG8r wrote:At this point, I'll take anyone that can catch the damn ball and is willing to be coached and be a program guy. I absolutely love Trey Burton and all he's been/done at UF, but his brother has bricks for hands. He is a blocking TE only. Gotta make up for that with some good-hands guys at WR.
makes me mad when they throw to C. Burton. kid can't catch at all.
He failed miserably on the fake fg against the clowns.
So did Trey on the throw.. A family afFAIL..
I'll get better on these

- FloridaFanatic22
- Freshman Gator
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:07 am
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
FloridaFanatic22 wrote:Gatorbythebay wrote:GatorKen wrote:NavetG8r wrote:At this point, I'll take anyone that can catch the damn ball and is willing to be coached and be a program guy. I absolutely love Trey Burton and all he's been/done at UF, but his brother has bricks for hands. He is a blocking TE only. Gotta make up for that with some good-hands guys at WR.
makes me mad when they throw to C. Burton. kid can't catch at all.
He failed miserably on the fake fg against the clowns.
So did Trey on the throw.. A family afFAIL..
![]()
I'll get better on these
You did fine "FlaFantick" just continue into: A family 'affailiation'.
Don't put a filter on your natural (subconscious) wit, even if you
are heckled by this crowd. That just means you drew wit out of
others.... and that's you giving a bloody transfusion to GSMB .
-

rogdochar - Bull Gator
- Posts: 6735
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:17 am
Re: Treadwell vs James Clark: Who looks better?
Clay Burton don't know what the "caught-ball-process" feels like.
Sooo, I'm thinking out of the box (as y'all yell "get back in !").
As training for biofeedback naturalism, fire him some
under-inflated balls. The extra drag allows his fingers to better
sense the surface of the ball's "escape slide". As his % of successful
grabs increase inflate the balls next notch up. And so forth. They
could even inflate beyond normal psi to make WRs' finger
auto-reflexes activate ball control quicker.
As fanciful as this sounds, its feasibility truth can be scientifically
tested as a grad student's project in statistical analysis.... meaning
experimental subject's (Wrs & TE's) progressive results will be
recorded & conclusions proved or disproved.
Just slightly under-inflated, the balls texture & frictional vibratory
drag can be felt (even through glove's surface) and the ball's
pass-through tapering shape will be sensed (subconsiously via
biofeedback repetition).'Til all is highly-tuned natural(subconscious)
auto-reflexive.
No need for "poobahs"; 1-2 days practice sessions would reveal if
this is promising or not. Besides, surely a grad-assistant can run
this valid research (for credit) even using non-team students who
played in H.S. Because improvement (or not) is recordable or not.
>> I know, "Everybody hold that Rosetta Stone 'agin' your forehead in
Carnak fashion.
Sooo, I'm thinking out of the box (as y'all yell "get back in !").
As training for biofeedback naturalism, fire him some
under-inflated balls. The extra drag allows his fingers to better
sense the surface of the ball's "escape slide". As his % of successful
grabs increase inflate the balls next notch up. And so forth. They
could even inflate beyond normal psi to make WRs' finger
auto-reflexes activate ball control quicker.
As fanciful as this sounds, its feasibility truth can be scientifically
tested as a grad student's project in statistical analysis.... meaning
experimental subject's (Wrs & TE's) progressive results will be
recorded & conclusions proved or disproved.
Just slightly under-inflated, the balls texture & frictional vibratory
drag can be felt (even through glove's surface) and the ball's
pass-through tapering shape will be sensed (subconsiously via
biofeedback repetition).'Til all is highly-tuned natural(subconscious)
auto-reflexive.
No need for "poobahs"; 1-2 days practice sessions would reveal if
this is promising or not. Besides, surely a grad-assistant can run
this valid research (for credit) even using non-team students who
played in H.S. Because improvement (or not) is recordable or not.
>> I know, "Everybody hold that Rosetta Stone 'agin' your forehead in
Carnak fashion.

-

rogdochar - Bull Gator
- Posts: 6735
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:17 am
24 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
