No, SHAME on you. Understand the reality of giving and giving so that everyone is equal despite their inability to compete fairly at all levels and all things. Why not give schollies based on race and color instead of actual competition? We would have mostly white players on our football and basketball team. Do you consider this fair????
Anyone for that proposition?
Taking schollies away from the worthy and giving it to non-qualified groups due to what is considered fairness is the Obama, liberal way of dealing with inadequate levels of achievement. Just to answer the previous poster, yes I enjoy women's sports....would enjoy it just as much if it was funded the right way. One unfair doctrine doesn't become less of an attraction when it is equally proposed. This is simple, but simple minds cannot grasp the concept.
Football should be exempt. The cash cow needs to stand on it's own and let everything else be equal. I can live with that. Trump got elected because dolts wanted to push the envelope even more left. Do you really think he would have won if we had a real leader in the white house?
What is so hard to understand that liberals want to create their own level playing field by corrupting the entire field itself. BTW, I am not a member of the GOP either. TRUTH is always hard to swallow whole. So those that can't understand, just take it slooooow.
Wait why did you say shame on me and then start talking about something that had nothing to do with what I said?...
My point is that not EVERY liberal ALWAYS over compensates on any issue regardless of fairness. Shame on me for believing that?
You said that a liberal ALWAYS over compensates on any issue regardless of fairness. I think you should just admit that was an exaggeration...
Trust me... I completely understand what you are saying...but when I see an incorrect blanket statement, I had to call it out. Thinking that all liberals think one thing or all conservatives think one thing is an extremely toxic way of thinking. It's kind of strange to see someone, who clearly thinks that they are so enlightened, not realize that.
In one of my graduate courses at UF, title IX took up an entire day in my education law class. It is a VERY VERY complicated issue (for dolts like myself anyway) that is hotly contested today as it has been since it was introduced, and a lot of that is because title IX extends to many more issues in institutions other than just sports (which I think a lot of sports fans are unaware of).
Whether it is fair or not with sports and scholarships is not a debate I care about, because it's not going to change any time soon anyway... so I admit it... forgive me lord, for I have sinned... I am straying off topic by attacking a particular part of your original post, instead of joining in on the discussion of whether title IX is fair or not.
I don't take issue with your topic, NOR DO I TAKE ISSUE WITH YOUR STANCE ON THIS SUBJECT OF TITLE IX and whether it should extend as far as it does, but I do take issue with someone using the topic to attack liberals (as if liberals all think and act the same way for every issue in any given situation). Just as I would take issue with someone using the topic to attack conservatives (as if conservatives all think and act the same way for every issue in any given situation). (I italicized and bolded those last two sentences because that was the point of my original response, which seems to have been misunderstood by you since when you responded to me you started making general title IX statements that you made in your original post... except with the added nuance of suggesting maybe I was too stupid to understand what you were saying? I'm making this post longer because I'm not great with words and I guess I didn't use enough of them the first time)
Title IX was a liberal idea, and it was put into place by liberals, and the statutes extended by liberals, but that doesn't mean that liberals ALWAYS over-compensate in any situation regardless of fairness. That is a toxic, silly, way to use a brain....especially since the statement is patently and objectively false.
For that, shame on you, friend.
Your entire original post (along with some of your following posts) gives me the impression that you were looking for a fight though, and I see that you got a few of them. Of course people responded as nastily (although, perhaps more overtly nasty) as the original post, and you got to sling around some of those insults against liberals that have been used since the dawn of time (heck, why even come up with creative insults for those fairies anyway, right?)... And you probably got to, temporarily, feel a little bit better for being on what you see as the morally (or maybe in this case, the ideologically?) superior ground.
And for that, congrats friend.