Emotional blather? I would call what you're writing has emotional blather as well. There is no logic in anything you are saying.
This attitude of kill for economic gain got us into terrible situations in latin america in the middle east. But you're cool with repeating history... so go ahead.
Now you're saying I'm emotional over terrorists? Terrorists and innocent women and children are two completely different things. That's logic.
We kill for many reasons, and it is moral from the perspective of the killer but immoral for the victim.
There is no absolute morality. God is the process underlying causality in the universe and this process is amoral. This God cares nothing about who is killed and who kills - this is irrelevant. Morality is not inherent in ontology - it is inherent in the human mind, and is only defined in hunam personality.
Killing is based in economy - dollars and cents. To kill or not is an economic decision, when you strip away the abstract values that are faulty inductions based on thought disorder. This is where logic is found.
Our intrusion into the mideast, like our involvement in Vietnam, was not based on logic, but was based more in abstract values stemming from emotion. From a dollars and cents logic, both intrusions were terrible in terms of costs-benefits.
Obama and the liberals want to flood this country with illegals, then give them the vote so they can vote for Democrats and their Marxist (income redistribution) policies. This is buying votes from the illegals at the expense of the USA taxpayer. In terms of dollars and cents, this is immoral for the USA.
Three out of four immigrant families with children receive welfare form USA taxpayers - greatly hurting the USA taxpayer citizens to help foreigners and foreign nations relieved of the burden of caring for them. This is not just illogical, it is crazy.
Killing enemy invaders (illegals) crossing the border is moral for the USA taxpayer because is is more effective and less costly than any other method of stopping illegal immigration. It will solve the problem after just a few are killed and cost the Taxpayer less than otherwise, which is moral from the perspective of the USA taxpayer. A woman or child is no less a foreign invader than a man - all are seeking to rob from the USA taxpayer.
Any opposing view to the above is illogical from a cost-benefit (moral) perspective for the USA, and thus any opposing view is emotionally distorted.
GatorUrf10, you are unable to offer any counter-argument based on reality and logic since my opinion is real and logical to the maximal degree. However, I hope you will try for the sake of a full discussion.